By Paul Reoch

A windfarm developer has appealed a decision by Perth and Kinross Council
to refuse its application for a nine-wind turbine development it claims
will bring £22.5 million of investment into Strathearn.

The controversial proposal submitted by Force 9 Energy for the site at Mull
Hill, Abercairney Estate, Crieff, would have been visible from Kinnoull
Hill in Perth, with the overall tip height being 104 metres.

The plan would have seen the windfarm built off the A822, north of Crieff,
at the gateway to the Sma’ Glen. It comprised part of the previous
Abercairney windfarm plan, which consisted of three clusters and a total of
24 wind turbines, that was refused by Scottish ministers after a public

Force 9 Energy had claimed each wind turbine would have a generating
capacity of around 2.5 megawatts per year but its last proposal was
rejected by Perth and Kinross Council’s development management committee in

Councillor Tom Gray, convener of the committee, claimed the sight of nine
turbines near to Gilmerton would “damage” the vision of the area.

As a result, the company has submitted an appeal to the Scottish Government
for the proposed Mull Hill windfarm, claiming that it would bring around
£22.5 million of investment in the region and also provide a Community
Benefit Fund of up to £78,750 per year or in excess of £1.9 million over
the lifetime of the project.

Andrew Smith, development manager at Force 9 Energy, said: “We have
carefully considered the reasons why the application was refused by Perth
and Kinross Council earlier this year. We believe that, in reaching its
decision, the council did not give enough weight to the significant
benefits that the proposal would bring, nor the Reporter’s recommendation
on the previous Abercairney wind farm.”

He continued: “A planning appeal is the best forum to examine these issues
in an impartial and objective manner. The Mull Hill Wind Farm proposal
complies with both existing local and national policy and with the Scottish
Government’s proposed new planning guidelines for windfarms because it does
not affect core areas of wild land and is more than 2.5km from towns and

“It will also bring a welcome economic boost and other benefits to the
local area.”

Mr Smith claimed that the Mull Hill windfarm proposal would bring
“long-lasting” socio-economic benefits to the local community of up to £3.6
million per annum, through reinvestment into the estate.

“It would assist in creating up to 15 new full-time jobs by the estate,” he

“These benefits are in addition to the substantial contribution that the
windfarm would make to the Scottish Government’s renewable energy targets
and the saving of approximately 25,425 tonnes of carbon dioxide each year
(compared to conventional fuel sources).”

SAS Volunteer

We publish content from 3rd party sources for educational purposes. We operate as a not-for-profit and do not make any revenue from the website. If you have content published on this site that you feel infringes your copyright please contact: to have the appropriate credit provided or the offending article removed.


Leave a Reply

Avatar placeholder

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *