A renewable energy firm is claiming a shot in the arm with more than 100
letters of support for its wind farm proposal at Birneyknowe.

Banks Renewables, of Hamilton, whose 15-turbine bid centres on a site
between Hawick and Bonchester, is “delighted” with the positive feedback,
and speaking to the Hawick News this week, the firm’s director, Phil Dyke,
said: “We continue to hear a lot of positive verbal feedback from residents
and this is reflected by the 106 people who took the time to enter a note
of support.”

“We’ve dedicated a lot of time to talking and listening to the community,
therefore I am absolutely delighted to see this kind of feedback. We’d
encourage others who are in favour of our proposals to make their voices
heard to the councillors and planning officials who will make the decision
on whether the wind farm is given the go-ahead.”

Among the local residents backing Banks’ proposal is former Borders College
finance chief Andrew Haddon, who said: “As long as wind farms are
sensitively designed, and are located in suitable areas, they can be a
valuable asset to local communities.”

Retired farmer Nicholas Ewart, of Acreknowe, has also thrown his weight
behind the turbines bid. He said: “Banks’ plans include a number of
economic benefits for the area, such as increased employment, so it’s
definitely something I’m supporting.”

Responding to support for the Birneyknowe wind farm bid, a spokesperson for
Hobkirk Community Council said: “It would be interesting to know how many
letters of support are from those with a direct or indirect financial interest.

“Hobkirk Community Council reflects the views of the vast majority of the
community in opposing the proposed Birneyknowe plans.”


SAS Volunteer

We publish content from 3rd party sources for educational purposes. We operate as a not-for-profit and do not make any revenue from the website. If you have content published on this site that you feel infringes your copyright please contact: webmaster@scotlandagainstspin.org to have the appropriate credit provided or the offending article removed.

0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Avatar placeholder

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *