PUBLIC trust in the planning process around major infrastructure
developments is at an all-time low.
And it’s not just about wind farms; a snapshot of letters pages and online
media on any given day reveals angst and suspicion stemming from the
sacrifice of areas of wild land, natural heritage, historic landscapes and
greenbelt to commercial priorities.
It is understood that difficult decisions need to be made for the good of
the nation and the planet. Yet, at a time when community empowerment is
supposed to be in the ascendant, it is ironic to see the honest concerns
expressed by local communities, and those united by the desire to conserve
our most important natural and cultural assets, swept aside in an unequal
battle with powerful commercial interests. As has recently been observed,
even the Scottish Government itself has been shown to disregard its expert
advisors.
This situation cannot continue and it is in everyone’s interests to find a
way forward.
If we are to rebuild public confidence in the planning process and in the
objectivity of Scottish Ministers responsible for making such decisions,
then we must find a way to demonstrate absolute transparency, impartiality
and fairness. Doing so would help those affected by planning outcomes to
accept unpalatable choices.
We propose that fresh impetus be given to revisiting the current planning
system with a view to improving existing procedures, potentially through
the creation of a body or process that is truly independent of government.
The goal would be to ensure clear, neutral adjudication over controversial
planning applications where there could be significant impact on important
landscapes, natural heritage interests or local communities.
We accept that there are many questions to answer over how any new
arrangements would be established, who would oversee them and so forth; but
it is a discussion we must have soon if we are to find a way out of the
morass of confusion and recrimination that characterises the present system.
Change would obviate the need for ill-funded individuals, communities and
charities to take on lavishly-subsidised developers in the courts where
they can rely upon the best advocacy money can buy. It would also create a
level playing field on which the needs of nature and communities can be
weighed alongside other priorities.
We invite the Scottish Government to join with us in an open discussion
based on our suggestions.
John Mayhew, Director, the Association for the Protection of Rural Scotland;
Stuart Brooks, Chief Executive, the John Muir Trust;
Brian Linington, President, Mountaineering Council of Scotland;
Peter Willimott, President, the Munro Society;
Sir Kenneth Calman, Chairman, the National Trust for Scotland;
David Thomson, Convener, Ramblers Scotland;
Stuart Housden OBE, Chief Executive, RSPB Scotland;
George Menzies, Chairman, Scottish Rights of Way and Access Society;
John Milne, Co-ordinator, Scottish Wild Land Group,
c/o Hermiston Quay,
5 Cultins Road,
Edinburgh.
0 Comments