Clydesdale villagers are claiming they are being massively shortchanged in
compensation payments for having a new windfarm built on their doorsteps.

In fact, many in Douglas/Glespin/Crawfordjohn area feel that they are being
completely by-passed in getting any of the direct community benefits that
would normally be paid by developers, claiming South Lanarkshire Council is
scooping all the compensation being paid by the company erecting the 14
turbines at the new Andershaw Windfarm.

The story begins almost a decade ago when SLC was first notified of a
developer’s intention to build the windfarm, this project later being taken
over by Statkraft, a wing of Norway’s state power company.

At that time the norm for compensation payments to communities impacted by
windfarm developments was £2500 per megawatt produced, this to be paid into
a council-run rural regeneration fund.

However, since then Scottish Government guidelines have doubled that
compensation payment to £5000 per megawatt, half of that now to go direct
to the affected villages for local groups to decide how its share of the
money should be spent.

The council only recently granted final planning permission for the
Andershaw Windfarm but says it can now do nothing about the
old,`half-price’ compensation deal it signed with the developer.

This has left many locals angry at missing out on an estimated £2.5m to
improve their area; Douglas Community Council has written to the developers
but were told by them they were sticking to the original financial agreement.

SLC’s Director of Enterprise Michael McGlynn explained: “This deal was
concluded some time ago and was agreed in accordance with Council policy at
that time.

“At that time it was Council policy to seek £2,500 per MW.”


SAS Volunteer

We publish content from 3rd party sources for educational purposes. We operate as a not-for-profit and do not make any revenue from the website. If you have content published on this site that you feel infringes your copyright please contact: webmaster@scotlandagainstspin.org to have the appropriate credit provided or the offending article removed.

1 Comment

Leave a Reply

Avatar placeholder

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *