By Stephen Temlett

Controversial proposals for huge pylons to be built across the region have
been scaled back.

ScottishPower Energy Networks (SPEN) has submitted amended plans for the
Dumfries and Galloway Strategic Reinforcement project to energy watchdog Ofgem.

Campaigners against the original 109-mile bid have welcomed the move.

The original proposals drew more than 1,600 responses and there will be a
public consultation on the new plans come the autumn.

SPEN had planned to build a massive network from Auchencrosh in Ayrshire,
through Dumfries and Galloway and into Cumbria.

But they have been forced to review the project which was dubbed
“uneconomic” by National Grid bosses.

The revised bid will stretch less than 30 miles between Kendoon and
Tongland in Galloway.

Dr Alan Jones, chairman of campaign group Dumgal Against Pylons, said: “We
are delighted that Scottish Power has listened to the concerns of
residents, community councils, Dumfries and Galloway Council, and the many
organisations which exist to protect Scotland’s unique and wonderful
environment.

“There are still some issues with the latest scheme which cause concern.
But overall, this revised scheme is to be welcomed.”

SPEN undertook another review of the proposals after changes to subsidy
arrangements for onshore windfarms from the UK Government.

They now determine a “reduced scheme” is the favourable option.

Pearse Murray, SP Energy Networks’ transmission director, said: “The future
of electricity generation in Scotland differs now in comparison to what was
forecast when we first started planning this upgrade.

“Our revised proposal will ensure that only the appropriate level of
infrastructure will be built at this time.”


SAS Volunteer

We publish content from 3rd party sources for educational purposes. We operate as a not-for-profit and do not make any revenue from the website. If you have content published on this site that you feel infringes your copyright please contact: webmaster@scotlandagainstspin.org to have the appropriate credit provided or the offending article removed.

0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Avatar placeholder

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *