By David Kerr

Plans for a 24-turbine windfarm in Caithness have been dealt a blow after
councillors decided to object to the scheme.

Members of Highland Council’s north planning committee overturned advice
from officials in order to oppose the Limekiln Windfarm.

The committee heard there were concerns about the impact on nearby wild
land, the village of Reay and the road network – including views from the
popular North Coast 500 tourist route.

The development by Infinergy would include nine 413ft turbines, and 15 of
456ft.

The council’s planning department had recommended that no objection should
be raised as long as the company agreed to remove or relocate three of the
turbines closest to Reay.

Concerns against the development were led by Landward Caithness councillors
David Bremner and Matthew Reiss.

The committee unanimously agreed to oppose the development.

The final decision rests with Scottish ministers after a public inquiry.

Fiona Milligan, of Infinergy, said: “We are extremely disappointed that the
north planning application committee have again objected to our proposal,
despite the findings of Scottish ministers following the last public inquiry.

“But we are encouraged that the professional opinion of the planning
officer at the Highland Council was to recommend no objection.

“We were also happy to go as far as to remove three turbines closest to
Reay, which was one of several options of mitigation the planning officer
sought.

“We continue to believe that Limekiln has a huge potential, not only to
reduce carbon emissions to help meet the Scottish Government’s ambitious
electricity generation targets, but to also provide significant investment
and economic benefits to the local area.”


SAS Volunteer

We publish content from 3rd party sources for educational purposes. We operate as a not-for-profit and do not make any revenue from the website. If you have content published on this site that you feel infringes your copyright please contact: webmaster@scotlandagainstspin.org to have the appropriate credit provided or the offending article removed.

0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Avatar placeholder

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *