The planned power cable linking Norway and Scotland, due to be operational
by 2023, should be postponed as it may overburden the Nordic region’s
existing infrastructure.

The North Connect, 1.4 gigawatt link is a joint project by three Norwegian
power firms and Sweden’s state utility Vattenfall.

It is currently due to be in operation by 2022 or 2023, with an investment
decision expected in 2019.

It could supply 25% of Scotland’s peak power demand with energy from
Norwegian hydropower dams and wind turbines, and would help Britain as
coal-fired power plants close and its oil and gas production declines in
the coming years.

But Norway’s grid operator Statnett has now said that adding more export
and import capacity will complicate operations in the Nordic grid,
requiring IT investments and close integration with Statnett – ‘all of
which can be difficult to achieve and have uncertain timelines.’

A spokesman added: “Statnett believes the startup of the connection should
take place at a later time than currently proposed.”

Statnett is already building two 1.4 (GW) subsea cables of its own to
Germany and Britain to start up in 2020 and 2021 respectively. The three
links each have a price tag of up to 2 billion euros ($2.5 billion).

Plugging in North Connect at the same time could make it challenging for
the Nordic grid to handle the flows and could lead to a capping of capacity
in order to keep the system reliable, said Statnett.

However, North Connect chairman Odd Oeygarden said the project partners
disagreed with Statnett’s report and would discuss the case with Norway’s
state regulator prior to an expected decision on issuing a licence.

“We haven’t changed our plans,” he said


SAS Volunteer

We publish content from 3rd party sources for educational purposes. We operate as a not-for-profit and do not make any revenue from the website. If you have content published on this site that you feel infringes your copyright please contact: webmaster@scotlandagainstspin.org to have the appropriate credit provided or the offending article removed.

0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Avatar placeholder

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *