By Kathryn Wylie
The rejection of plans for a 15-turbine wind farm near Hawick has been
hailed a victory for the communities which fought against the development
for almost five years.
Banks Renewables appealed to the Scottish Government after Scottish Borders
Council threw out plans for the Birneyknowes wind farm development near
Bonchester Bridge.
The County Durham-based firm’s South Lanarkshire operation had hoped to
build the 132m-high turbines on land north, south, east and west of
Birneyknowe Cottage, two and a half miles south east of Hawick and a mile
west of Bonchester Bridge.
The idea garnered widespread opposition from locals, and in March 2017
councillors unanimously agreed to object to the development due to its
landscape, visual and cultural impact, saying it would have “major
significant impacts on the historic environment” including Rubers Law, a
hill south of Denholm.
The size of the project meant a final decision lay with the Scottish
government and a two-day public inquiry was held at Minto Golf Club one
year on, last March.
The reporter assigned to the inquiry, David Liddle, has now concluded the
benefits of the scheme’s contribution to renewable energy targets did not
outweigh concerns about its visual and landscape impact.
A notice issued by Scottish ministers said: “The reporter had significant
concerns about the nature, degree and extent of the adverse landscape and
visual effects which would arise in this instance.”
That is a decision welcomed by Philip Kerr, chairman of Southdean Community
Council and Chesters Wind Farm Action Group, who commended the report’s
outcome and detail.
“The local community councils were pleased to see the decision from the
Scottish Government, and the report accompanying the decision was
particularly detailed,” he said.
“It was very clear to see the major concerns with the scheme, landscape and
visual impact and residential amenity tied in closely with the major thrust
of local community objections and those from Scottish Borders Council.
“By giving such detail it makes it easier for local communities to
understand the decision making process, which they have been involved with
from start. “
“Local communities had felt that from the schemes introduction that
Birneyknowe along with Cummings Hill and Highlee Hill were particularly
inappropriately located for the local area, and were amongst the earliest
larger scale applications.
“The latter two were withdrawn and Birneyknowe has now been rejected. There
are clearly a still variety of schemes at various stages of consideration,
but Birneyknowe was a particularly ill-judged scheme and its refusal is a
key decision which is to be welcomed.”
Hawick councillor Watson McAteer added: “It is hugely satisfying that the
Scottish Government has finally listened to the residents of Bonchester
Bridge and local area who fought long and hard to prevent the Birneyknowe
wind farm.
“The reporters recommendation was made following a very active local
campaign where the impact on the fantastic natural landscape and wildlife
were key to refusal.
“I can only hope that this decision is replicated when further applications
are being made in our community where the natural beauty of our Borderlands
are being sacrificed for commercial profit.”
The site was chosen as it did not lie in any special protected area for
landscaping, nature conservation or any archaeological or historical
designations.
And while more than 100 letters of support were received initially,
Southdean, Hawick, Hobkirk and Denholm community councils all opposed the
development.
Hawick and Denholm councillor, Neil Richards, said: “I would like to say
that the efforts of the various community councils involved were outstanding.
“The planning committee will obviously be vindicated because to take on
developers as planners can be a costly exercise.
“Taking on developers is not exactly an even playing field either. It seems
to be easier for them rather than the council or individuals taking on
windfarm firms.
“The councillors in Hawick and Denholm have been fully behind the efforts
of the community councils that have been up against it as its on their
lands as such.
“I’m very pleased, I just hope we can win a few more now.
“Someone said to be that if Birneyknowe had been passed there would have
been no application that couldn’t be passed. It was so inappropriate.”
Banks Renewables said that the project would provide a £2.5m community
benefit fund and promised to improve access to jobs in the area by
providing a new fund to boost training and workplace opportunities.


SAS Volunteer

We publish content from 3rd party sources for educational purposes. We operate as a not-for-profit and do not make any revenue from the website. If you have content published on this site that you feel infringes your copyright please contact: webmaster@scotlandagainstspin.org to have the appropriate credit provided or the offending article removed.

1 Comment

Mark Elliott · June 16, 2019 at 7:29 am

How to contact; Philip Kerr, chairman of Southdean Community
Council and Chesters Wind Farm Action Group. Reference Malcolm McGregor, HAG.

Leave a Reply

Avatar placeholder

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *