By Stephen Walsh
Planners have renewed their objection to a proposed 26-turbine wind farm,
which it is feared would blight the north-east’s iconic landscape.
Developer Coriolis Energy wants to build the wind farm at Glendye, near
Fettercairn, and has lodged plans with the Scottish Government.
A number of organisations have already voiced their objections to the
scheme, including the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa), the
Ministry of Defence and hillwalkers.
Now Aberdeenshire Council’s infrastructure services committee looks likely
to join them by recommending the plan be rejected next week.
A report which will be discussed by the committee sets out a range of
objections to the plans.
Officers consider the scale and size of the turbines are too high for the
site, which is earmarked for “domestic” sized structures of 49ft or less.
And the report also claims the developer has underestimated the impact the
turbines will have on surrounding hillwalking routes and viewpoints.
It is also alleged that “blanking” agreements have not been reached with
National Air Traffic Control (Nats) or the MOD – this is to prevent
turbines from cluttering up radar screens, which can create false images or
mask the location of aircraft.
And planners also point out the windfarm site is located within two
designated special landscape areas and, furthermore, they fear it would
have a negative impact on the Cairn O’Mount.
Under the scheme, which was first unveiled in 2016, turbines would be
installed on a 3,700 acre site.
Each would have a maximum height of 492ft from ground to blade tip and an
electrical capacity of around four mega-watts (MW).
That would generate an anticipated 104 MW across the development, which
could have a 30-year lifespan.
Coriolis Energy believes the spot would be ideal for generating
environmentally-friendly electricity.
The Save Clachnaben – Stop the Glendye Windfarm group and the John Muir
Trust have both spoken out against the plans.
1 Comment
Ian Miller · March 11, 2019 at 12:15 pm
“Coriolis Energy believes the spot would be ideal for generating
environmentally-friendly electricity.”
“ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY” ! MY FOOT
MORE TRUTHFULLY: “ENVIRONMENTALLY VANDALISTIC” .