This judgement (below) is nothing to do with the content of the evidence in the planning inquiry. The appellants (objectors) had claimed that their evidence had not been considered by the planning board even though they specifically asked that it should be. The supreme court found for the appellants and quashed the permission because the Board had not considered the evidence – even though they conceded that it would have been rejected by the board if they had considered it.…/supreme-court-overturns-permis……/5f9a02cc-c7…/2019_IESC_90_1.pdf/pdf

SAS Volunteer

We publish content from 3rd party sources for educational purposes. We operate as a not-for-profit and do not make any revenue from the website. If you have content published on this site that you feel infringes your copyright please contact: to have the appropriate credit provided or the offending article removed.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *