When there is a collision between different government policies with the same purpose the result is sure to be messy, and the chances are that the benefits arising from both policies will be compromised and perhaps lost altogether. The Scottish Government, for example, aims to reduce carbon dioxide emissions through the enhancement of carbon sinks, such as forestry and peat, while also encouraging the generation of electricity from industrial wind power. Since both projects are land hungry and the United Kingdom’s geographical area is finite or even diminishing, it is highly unlikely that targets for forestry and peatlands, on the one hand, and renewables on the other can be simultaneously approximated, let alone met and maximised.

 

This problem, long known to specialists, has been brought into sharp focus this week by the coincidental publication of two documents, first a study by the Committee on Climate Change, Land use: Policies for a Net Zero UK, and secondly the Scottish Government’s response to Freedom of Information request relating to deforestation caused by wind farm development.

https://www.ref.org.uk/ref-blog/357-land-use-for-a-low-carbon-future-forestry-and-peat-versus-wind-power

Categories: SAS Blog

SAS Volunteer

We publish content from 3rd party sources for educational purposes. We operate as a not-for-profit and do not make any revenue from the website. If you have content published on this site that you feel infringes your copyright please contact: webmaster@scotlandagainstspin.org to have the appropriate credit provided or the offending article removed.

0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *