With regards the ongoing debate about windfarms in Kintyre, we – the leaders of the 3 most impacted communities – would like to express our viewpoint.
The development of wind farms across Kintyre is on an industrial scale, as demonstrated by the attached map. This will, of course, change the landscape of Kintyre because the scale and size of these wind farms will result in visible impacts the length and breadth of the Kintyre peninsula, and beyond. Argyll & Bute Council’s landscape study categorically states there is no scope for wind turbines over 150m, which recognises the need to balance local tourism with windfarm developer’s profit and the need for renewable energy. Yet, the majority of developers are proposing to breach this with heights of 180-230m(similar to those used off-shore and 2-3x the height of the majority of the existing Kintyre turbines). Turbines of this size will automatically require navigation lights impacting the dark skies as well as the day time visual amenity. Developers are doing so simply to maximise their profits.
Pockets of windfarm Community Benefit Funding have been appreciated by Kintyre, but Scottish Government 2019 Good Practice Guide Principles have now been introduced to try and ensure that all consented wind farms grant impacted communities at least £5K per installed MW in Community Benefit Funds (CBF) AND offer an element of Community Shared Ownership (CSO). The funds incoming to thelocal communities will enable wealth building, facilitate resilience, and empowerment through the delivery of Local Development Plans. However, experience to date is that the majority of commercial developers are NOT offering Shared Ownership meeting with Scottish Government Guidelines and some are not even offering CBF, which is completely unacceptable. A petition has been raised through parliament promoting the view that CSO should be mandatory using the Scottish Government’s devolved land tax powers. In the interim, all developers are being challenged by EKREG on behalf of the communities affected. EKREG are a volunteer group with significant relevant experience who act on behalf of all Kintyre Community Councils in relation to CSO negotiations.
To date only 1 (out of 14) developer has committed in writing to CSO which meets the Scottish Government’s Good Practice Principles. This is RWE who are required to do so because of the terms of their lease with FLS. PI Renewables/Escart Wind Farm have refused to interact at all, two other developers, RES and Blue Energy have refused to offer CSO and another, EnergieKontor (with 2 of the tallest developments in the pipeline), says it may consider an offer at a later, as yet unspecified date. But, given this developer needed significant cajoling by EKREG to even grant CBF, it seems unlikely that they will make a CSO commensurate with Scottish Government Guidelines.
Scottish Power Renewables (SPR), a distribution network operator (DNO) have recently powered-up their latest windfarm in the region (Beinn an Tuirc 3) and two more of their developments are in the pipeline. SPR were major stakeholders in developing, agreeing and signing up to the 2019 Scottish Government Good Practice Guidance. They promised the impacted communities that they would offer CSO and the template used would then be replicated across SPR’s other Scottish Developments. Disgracefully, SPR reneged on their commitment to offer CSO and instead tabled a short-terminvestment with a pre-dictated rate of return. While communities are pleased to have been able to secure CBF from SPR, eventually for the lifetime of the windfarm, the offer made by SPR to the impacted Kintyre Communities for CSO was extremely disappointing. The communities’ financial adviser, QMPF, stated that it failed to meet Scottish Government Guidelines for CSO. The offer made little financial sense to the impacted communities and the community councils wholeheartedly agreed with this view.
The reluctance to offer and facilitate the take up of CSO is driven by the same purely profit driven mentality that underpins the desire of the developers to cover Kintyre in off-shore sized turbines that will devastate our tourism industry. As a consequence, communities across Kintyre are missing out on the life-changing financial income that would be commensurate with an equity stake in these and other windfarms across the region. This is an unfair and unacceptable situation, and a matter that appears to require strong and immediate action by the Scottish Government.
Our elected MSP and Regional List MSPs: Jenni Minto (SNP), Douglas Ross (Scottish Conservative & Unionist), Edward Mountain (Scottish Conservative & Unionist), Rhoda Grant (Scottish Labour), Donald Cameron (Scottish Conservative & Unionist), Ariane Claire Burgess Scottish Green), Jamie Halcro Johnston (Scottish Conservative & Unionist) and Emma Roddick (SNP) all now need to step up and seriously support the residents of Kintyre by supporting the community-oriented petition presently with the Scottish Government that CSO should be mandatory and delivered using devolved land tax legislation.
Regards
Ian Brodie ,Convener,East Kintyre Community Council
Margaret Pratt, Convener,West Kintyre Community Council
Valerie Nimmo, Convener,Campbeltown Community Council
May be an image of map and text that says "The Campbeltown Courie Community shared ownership wind farms should be mandatory regards ongoing debate about wind three would Scottish Government guidelines. Renewables distribution powered-u pipeline, SP a and isible Kintyre Guidance. Council's study Scottish majority existing using Government's devolved affected developers Renewable behalf volunteer CSo incoming communities life-changing through situation, fthe view wtha inthe ata later, petition unspec should developer grant CSO Community Nimmo, y Council."

SAS Volunteer

We publish content from 3rd party sources for educational purposes. We operate as a not-for-profit and do not make any revenue from the website. If you have content published on this site that you feel infringes your copyright please contact: webmaster@scotlandagainstspin.org to have the appropriate credit provided or the offending article removed.

0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Avatar placeholder

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *