Concerns have been raised about how seriously Shetland Charitable Trust is
taking a health study into the impact of the planned Viking Energy wind farm.

The trust commissioned the study in June last year as a pre-condition to
releasing a further £6.3 million towards the 103 turbine project, in which
it holds a 45 per cent share.

The study was compiled by NHS Shetland’s director of public health, Dr
Sarah Taylor, and published without fanfare on the health board’s website
in July.

Her 48 page report
[available at

Click to access Report_on_Health_Impacts_Wind_Farms.pdf


– G] comes before the trust for the first time on Thursday, and is marked for
“noting” as it was “not directly commissioned” by the trust.

Anti-Viking campaign group Sustainable Shetland said the report identified
some important concerns, particularly in relation to mental health.

A spokesman said: “We hope the charitable trust will make a public response
to it, outlining what action, if any, they intend to take in view of the
findings.

“We would also like some clarity on who commissioned and paid for the report.”

Former trust chairman Drew Ratter explained: “As chair, I would have had to
have commissioned a study, and Shetland Charitable Trust would have had to
pay for it.

“However, Sarah Taylor offered to do it gratis, and retain ownership of it.
This offer was accepted.”

Taylor herself said she had agreed to write the report as long as she could
keep the intellectual property rights.

She said: “What I agreed to was that I would write the report, make it
available to the trustees but publish it myself. I didn’t take any money
for it, as I regarded this as part of my public health job.”

For the report she reviewed a huge amount of good quality research, which
established a clear relationship between the level of noise and the
proximity of houses to wind farms.

“The more recent studies are absolutely relevant to the Shetland
situation,” she said.

“But the things that people do need to take into account in relation to the
Shetland proposals are about size of turbines and the number of turbines
proposed.

“Much of the research has come from industrial-sized wind farms, but not
necessarily of the scale of the Shetland proposal, which has more and
larger size turbines than much of the historical work.”

She added that it had not been her brief to look into the potential health
impact of the proposed Viking wind farm on the people of Shetland.


SAS Volunteer

We publish content from 3rd party sources for educational purposes. We operate as a not-for-profit and do not make any revenue from the website. If you have content published on this site that you feel infringes your copyright please contact: webmaster@scotlandagainstspin.org to have the appropriate credit provided or the offending article removed.

1 Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *