Generous taxpayer subsidies will be cut off earlier than expected,
effectively preventing thousands of turbines from being built, under plans
being considered by Amber Rudd, the energy secretary

By Emily Gosden, Energy Editor

Subsidies that have fuelled the spread of onshore wind farms are to be
dramatically curtailed, under Government plans to be unveiled within days.

The Telegraph has learnt that a generous subsidy scheme will be shut down
earlier than expected, effectively preventing thousands of turbines from
getting built, under plans being considered by Amber Rudd, the new energy
secretary.

The proposals, which could be announced as soon as this week, will set out
for the first time how the Conservatives will implement their manifesto
pledge to end any new public subsidy for onshore wind farms – amid concerns
that turbines are unpopular with local communities.

Under current policy, any big onshore wind turbines built before the end of
March 2017 would automatically be able to qualify for generous payments
through a scheme called the Renewables Obligation (RO), which is funded
through green levies on consumer energy bills.

The Department of Energy and Climate Change has now confirmed it plans to
“reform” the RO scheme. It is understood to be looking at ending the
free-for-all by shutting the scheme down early – effectively preventing
thousands of turbines getting built. The action follows similar moves taken
to curb subsidies for solar farms last year.

After the RO shuts, the only possible subsidies for wind farms will be
through a new scheme that is less generous and also much more strictly
rationed, with ministers deciding how many projects – if any – are awarded
subsidy contracts, enabling them to block further onshore wind if desired.

As well as big wind farms, subsidies for small individual wind turbines
such as those popular with farmers – funded through a separate scheme
called the Feed in Tariff – are expected to be limited under the plans.

A spokesman for the DECC said: “We are driving forward plans to end new
public subsidy for onshore wind farms.

“We will shortly be publishing our plans to reform the Renewables
Obligation and Feed in Tariff scheme to implement this commitment. With the
cost of supplying onshore wind falling, government subsidy is no longer
appropriate.

“We have supported new technologies when they’ve been a good deal for the
consumer – providing start-up funding and certainty about future payments
to help them become competitive. However, those subsidies won’t continue
when costs come down – that’s not value for money for billpayers in the
long run.”

Ms Rudd said: “We promised people clean, affordable and secure energy
supplies and that’s what I’m going to deliver. We’ll focus support on
renewables when they’re starting up – getting a good deal for billpayers is
the top priority.”

Government plans to tackle climate change and hit EU renewable energy
targets envisage that between 11 and 13 gigawatts (GW) of onshore wind
power is needed by 2020.

More than 9.5 GW of projects – about 5,500 turbines – have either already
been built or are under construction in the UK. At least 5.2 GW more wind
farms – almost 3,000 more turbines – have already been granted planning
permission.

Even if not all of these are built there would still be enough to hit the
top end of Government plans.

On top of that, there are close to 3,000 more big new turbines with a
combined capacity of more than 7GW seeking planning permission.

The DECC spokesman said: “Looking at what has already had planning
permission, there is enough onshore wind to contribute what’s needed to
reach the ambition set out in the Coalition Government’s renewables roadmap
that 30 per cent of our electricity should come from renewables by 2020.”

Many of the projects that already have planning permission would have been
expecting to secure subsidies under the RO scheme and it is not clear
whether they will still be able to if the scheme shuts early. Ministers may
consider offering a ‘grace period’, enabling some of those that already
have permission to still get built while blocking off subsidies for those
that do not.

One of the biggest factors determining the impact of the proposed changes
will be whether or not they apply in Scotland, where the majority of
proposed turbines are due to be built.

The Government said last week that it would “consult with the devolved
administrations on changes to subsidy regimes for onshore wind farms”.

Nicola Sturgeon, the SNP Scottish First Minister, wants more onshore wind
farms and has already demanded a veto on the Tory plans – raising the
prospect that subsidies could continue to be paid to new projects in Scotland.

However the Conservatives will be under pressure from their own backbenches
to ensure the subsidies are scrapped across the UK.

The Government also announced in the Queen’s Speech last week that it would
bring forward legislation to give local communities “the final say” by
ensuring large wind farm projects are decided at local rather than national
level.

Ms Rudd said: “We need to make decisions on energy more democratic and give
our communities a direct say into new onshore wind farms where they live.
In future, I want planning decisions on onshore wind farms to be made by
local people – not by politicians in Westminster.”

However those in the green energy industry had been most concerned about
the pledge to end subsidies, amid uncertainty over the detail of the plans.

Critics of the Conservative pledge, including Tim Yeo, the former Tory head
of the energy committee, and Ed Davey, the former Lib Dem energy secretary,
have argued that it will actually push up bills as ministers instead offer
subsidies to more offshore wind farms that are even more expensive.


SAS Volunteer

We publish content from 3rd party sources for educational purposes. We operate as a not-for-profit and do not make any revenue from the website. If you have content published on this site that you feel infringes your copyright please contact: webmaster@scotlandagainstspin.org to have the appropriate credit provided or the offending article removed.

3 Comments

Leave a Reply

Avatar placeholder

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *