By Chris MacLennan
Two wind turbine developments in the Highlands have been rejected by
Scottish ministers in a move approved by the John Muir Trust charity.
A public local inquiry (PLI) was conducted into the proposed 20-turbine
development at Caplich in Sutherland, raising concerns of significant harm
to two wild land areas as well as compromising the natural environment,
amenity and heritage resources of the areas.
A separate PLI was conducted on the proposed 13-turbine development at
Culachy, Fort Augustus, with the results citing impacts on one wild land
area and the development not being in the right place.
Andrew Bachell, chief executive of the John Muir Trust, said: “We are
delighted at these decisions and pleased the Scottish Government is sending
out a strong message that our wild and scenic places are of national
“Since the Wild Land Areas map was approved in 2014, 10 wind farms with a
total of nearly 200 turbines have been refused because of their impact on
these landscapes and ecosystems.
“We would hope that these latest decisions will help persuade developers to
focus their efforts on less sensitive areas.”
One project at Strathy South wind farm in Sutherland was approved by the
Scottish Government, however, much to the disapproval of the John Muir Trust.
Mr Bachell added: “We recognise the need for renewable energy but
unnecessarily wrecking one part of the environment in exchange for another
does not make sense.”
The development is located on the edge of the Flow Country peat lands in
Sutherland and has also received criticism from RSPB Scotland.
The move to grant planning permission comes three years after a public
inquiry took place.
An RSPB spokeswoman said: “Strathy South is right in the very heart of the
Caithness and Sutherland Peatlands Special Protection Area and Ramsar, a
European and internationally important place for wildlife. The decision to
approve a wind farm in this extremely sensitive location sits very
awkwardly with Scottish ministers’ commitments to maintain the highest
international environmental standards.”