Scotland Against Spin
  • Home
  • About
  • News
  • Wind Energy FAQs
  • Resources
  • Galleries
    • Inverness Protest 2013
    • Perth Protest – 2013
    • SAS stand at SNP Conference
  • Accident Statistics
  • Contact Us

Concerns remain but no official council objection over revised £2bn offshore Angus windfarm – Courier

Published by SAS Volunteer on December 12, 2018 December 12, 2018

By Graham Brown
Angus Council has stepped back from a formal objection to changes for a £2
billion offshore wind farm which will see turbines rise to almost 300
metres off the county’s coast.
The Inch Cape Offshore Limited (ICOL) scheme is one of three multi-billion
pound turbine arrays proposed for the outer Firths of the Tay and Forth in
a zone stretching from around ten miles into the North Sea.
Alterations to the previously consented scheme will see the number of
turbines drop from 110 to 72, but their hub height will rise from 129
metres to more than 160 metres above LAT (lowest astronomical tide), with
maximum turbine heights rising from 172m to 250m, or 820 feet.
The local authority has said concerns remain over the array’s “significant
impacts” on the historic Bell Rock lighthouse, 11 miles off the coast of
Arbroath, as well as the cumulative effect of the Neart Na Gaoithe and
Seagreen windfarms also in the pipeline.
In a fresh consultee response over the Inch Cape changes, council planning
leader Kate Cowey has called for a “co-ordinated approach” which would
avoid larger turbines being stacked in the foreground of the view visible
from Angus.
It states: “Whilst the development proposes to reduce the overall number of
turbines the respective increase in tip height and rotor diameter will
invariably make the individual turbines more visible.
“The night time viewpoints confirm that the lighting would be viewed in
close association and at a greater height to the light on the Bell Rock
lighthouse.
“Further consideration requires to be given to this matter in order to
ensure an appropriate technical solution is identified and if this is the
case the associated effects would be unlikely to be unacceptable.”
The response adds: “We would stress that a key cumulative consideration is
the relative height and design of the three different off-shore wind farm
developments.
“A level of consistency is important to prevent the collective view
becoming visually inconsistent or distorting seascape perspective by having
turbines of noticeably different sizes within the same view.
“The proposal for Inch Cape potentially proposes the use of 291m high
turbines. This scale of turbine would be greater in height than the
potential 208m high turbines proposed by Neart Na Gaoithe.
“This would lead to a situation whereby larger turbines are located in the
foreground with smaller turbines in the background.
“Although this proposal is not unacceptable in its own right, in order to
avoid a confusing and poorly harmonised visual image a co-ordinated
approach to the finalised height of each development should be considered.”
The Inch Cape development recently took a significant step forward when
ICOL said it had entered into agreement with three companies to deliver the
export cable infrastructure needed to connect the array to the power grid.
Up to 1,900 full-time equivalent jobs are expected to be created during the
three-year construction period, providing a projected £240 million per
annum boost to the economy.


Share this:

  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
Categories: Other News.....

SAS Volunteer

We publish content from 3rd party sources for educational purposes. We operate as a not-for-profit and do not make any revenue from the website. If you have content published on this site that you feel infringes your copyright please contact: webmaster@scotlandagainstspin.org to have the appropriate credit provided or the offending article removed.

0 Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Avatar placeholder

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search site
Planet of the Humans
Latest News
  • Scottish onshore wind and the post-2030 connections challenge – Morton Fraser McRoberts
  • Scotsman letters
  • Scotsman letters
News Archive
December 2018
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
« Nov   Jan »

Related Posts

Scottish onshore wind and the post-2030 connections challenge – Morton Fraser McRoberts

Under the Clean Power Action Plan and the connections reform that sits beneath it, only around 700 MW of additional Scottish onshore wind is permitted to connect between 2031 and 2035. Set against more than Read more

Scotsman letters

Aileen Jackson (Letters, 27 July) is right to be concerned about the proposed re-powering of Whitelee Wind Farm. Since 2010 Whitelee has received more than £165 million in constraints payments. In the first six months Read more

Scotsman letters

George Herraghty hits the nail on the head (Letters, 24 July) with his criticism of the crushing Scottish Power Renewables (SPR) plan to repower the Whitelee wind farm. For local residents who had hoped to Read more

Featured Group

Renewable Energy Foundation
The Renewable Energy Foundation is a registered charity promoting sustainable development for the benefit of the public by means of energy conservation and the use of renewable energy.

RSS REF Blog (RSS)
About SAS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyUPMSJvj_E
Media Enquiries
Graham Lang (Chair)
E: info@scotlandagainstspin.org
Follow Us
  • Facebook Facebook icon
  • Twitter Twitter icon
  • Twitter youtube icon
SiteLock
SiteLock
Featured Group

National Wind Watch® (NWW) is a coalition of groups and individuals working to save rural and wild places from heedless industrial wind energy development.

RSS Scottish News (RSS)
  • Humiliated SNP admits there is no community support for giant wind turbines but ignore local opposition
  • Sand art created on beach in protest against Berwick Bank
  • Windfarm fears for safety of seabirds
  • Frustration at delay to Caithness wind farm’s community benefit scheme

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
Developed by Design Fife
Request Donation Details

Please enter your email address and we will send you information so you can make a donation. We are grateful for your support.
Loading