The document was an analysis of all the contributions that had been made to the consultation as the SNP look to refresh their wind farm policy.
Wind farm campaign group Scotland Against Spin contributed to the discussion but were left angered when a “very significant proportion” of their response was redacted.
This included key information about the Beuly Denny transmission line which the group claim is where electricity is transported hundreds of miles away and local people are forced to pay for it.
The £820 million project was paid for by Scottish Hydroelectricity and Scottish Power and exports power from northern Scotland’s onshore wind farms and will be used for future developments. Ofgem allowed the cost of this to be recouped from customers.
So despite the wind farms being in the north, all the power is being transferred around the UK at an expense to the bill-payer instead of it being used more efficiently closer to the generation site.
It is just one section of their lengthy response which was omitted by the Scottish Government who were accused of using the consultation as a “wish list” for the renewable industry.
A spokeswoman for the group told the Scottish Daily Express: “SAS has asked the Scottish Government why a very significant proportion of our response was redacted.
“They consult but then apparently remove anything which doesn’t suit them, the usual response being “It’s not in the public interest” or It’s not relevant”. Everything in our submission was very relevant and definitely in the public interest. We await their response.
“It was evident this ‘public’ consultation was designed for the renewable industry so that they could post their wish list to be taken on board by the Scottish Gov.
Their 27-page response to the consultation is riddled with a number of redactions, with a whole page even blurred out so the reader cannot see what they are writing about.
0 Comments